S&OP Didn’t Work Here. Weekly Reviews Did.
A formal S&OP process never took hold. A demand planning leader explains what replaced it: a weekly review with a narrower agenda, and a room where everyone can act on what they're shown.
A conversation between Sujit Singh, COO of Arkieva, and a demand planning leader at an automotive aftermarket distributor carrying more than a million SKUs across 75 locations.
Our planner has been forecasting for close to thirty years. She has been at her current company for four and a half years, and the role didn’t exist before she took it. What she inherited was a platform producing a statistical forecast and a habit of treating that forecast as an inventory dial.
Her company tried to build a formal S&OP process on top of that. It never took hold. What they run now is smaller, but it works.
What This Team Does Differently
![]()
They traded the monthly forum for a weekly one with a narrower agenda.
Product management, inventory, and specific SKU groups. The meeting doesn’t cover the business end to end, and nobody pretends it does. What it has instead is a room where everyone present can act on what gets brought to them.
![]()
They answer inventory requests with a sales question.
When leadership asks for more or less, her team asks what the business expects to sell and who is going to buy it. That is the slow work of moving a forecast off being a dial, and it’s still in progress.
The Conversation, in Three Parts
Part 1. Why planning loses to the work with a deadline

Planner: One of the challenges with demand planning in general is getting a business to understand the benefit of it. Some industries don’t quite see it. Coming into the company I’m at now, they didn’t have this position before. They used the forecast as inventory control. Moving away from that has been the challenge.
Sujit: There’s that, and there’s a second thing on top of it. Companies will give you a nice pat on the back for a good job done at firefighting. They don’t necessarily do the same for a good job done at planning, and you could argue that promotes the wrong behavior. I’ve always felt there is a vitamin mindset and a painkiller mindset. Planning is the vitamin. Everyone agrees it’s important, and it’s never urgent. Firefighting is urgent, and it’s important too. So it wins.
Planner: We live that as demand planners all the time.
“
Planning is like taking vitamins. Everyone agrees it’s important, and it’s never urgent. Firefighting is like a painkiller. It is important AND urgent!
Part 2. What Happened When They Tried
The meetings ran. They asked the room for something the company had never been set up to produce.
Sujit: I’m imagining there is some kind of monthly management review, an S&OP type of meeting, where these things get worked out.
Planner: We tried S&OP meetings here. They haven’t been successful.
Sujit: Let me offer a few reasons from my own history, and you tell me where you land. Sometimes there’s so much money to be made that getting the executives together to plan feels burdensome. Sometimes the complexity is high enough that people feel threatened by it. And sometimes it’s simply that this is how we have always done it. We have a twenty-year history of never doing S&OP, so why start now? We are a successful company.
Planner: For us, it’s not understanding the importance of it. And some of that last one. Even when we were trying to run them, the executives weren’t really involved. My team would meet with the sales executives. We would tell them what was happening and ask how they were planning to close the gap, and what we could do to help. They didn’t know how to answer that question.


Sujit: So the meeting asked them for something they didn’t have.
Planner: That’s how it felt. They still saw the forecast as an inventory tool. We want more, we want less, pull it down, add it. Not necessarily because we’re planning to sell more of it; they just want more inventory, or they want less. That’s the part I keep working on. Don’t tell me you want inventory. Tell me what you are going to sell. What is your customer looking for?
Sujit: And closing the distance between those two questions is the entire job.
Planner: It is. I think it comes down to knowledge, and getting people to understand that this matters.
Part 3. What they run instead
Smaller room, narrower agenda, more often.
Sujit: Without the monthly forum, where does the coordination actually happen now?
Planner: Weekly reviews with product management, purchasing, and the inventory team. We discuss specific SKUs within product groups. That’s where we do the work of combining items, getting rid of items, and moving demand around. We aren’t looking at the whole picture in those meetings. We aren’t covering the business end-to-end. But it’s focused, and decisions come out of it.
Sujit: Smaller room, narrower agenda, more often.
Planner: And everyone involved can act on what is discussed.
Sujit: Which is worth naming for anyone whose own attempt has stalled. A forum works when the people in the room can act on what is put in front of them.
Planner: That’s what we have now. It’s smaller than what we set out to build, and it moves.

Sujit’s Read: What This Looks Like Across Companies
When an S&OP process stalls, it usually gets described as resistance. In my experience, it’s more often a forum asking the room for something the company was never set up to produce. If nobody has ever owned the question of how a gap gets closed, putting executives in a monthly meeting doesn’t create the answer. It just makes the absence visible, and people stop coming.
What this team did is the move I would recommend to anyone in that position. Shrink the room until everyone in it can act, narrow the agenda until the decisions are concrete, and run it often enough that the decisions stay small. That is a real trade and worth being honest about. They gave up the end-to-end view, and they got a forum that produces decisions.
TWO CAUTIONS
1. A weekly SKU review doesn’t replace what a working S&OP process gives you, so this is a way forward rather than a destination.
2. The habit underneath the original problem hasn’t gone away. Her leadership still asks the forecast to move for inventory reasons, and she is still answering with a question about what they expect to sell. That work is slower than changing a meeting.
This is one piece in a longer set of conversations with practitioners about what it takes to stay ready for the disruptions that arrive in ordinary, unglamorous ways. More of these conversations are coming.
Continue the Practitioner Files
You Don't Need Five Forecasts
Every new vendor splits the demand signal, and this team pools it back under one planning code.
Read More →: Practitioner File 01: The Vendor Proliferation Problem
Your Catalog Sees Where Demand Is Headed
One code on every part tells this team where demand is heading before sales history does.
Read More →: Practitioner File 02: Reading the Weather Before It Hits Your Forecast